The Registration Divide 2026: in Zurich 31 of 1,000 households register their domestic help, in Lucerne 11, and inspection density explains nothing
For the first time for all 26 cantons: how many households register their cleaner, nanny or carer under the simplified settlement procedure, per 1,000 private households. The gap between the best and the worst canton without Chèque-Emploi is a factor of 4.7. Four hypotheses, three of them refuted: inspections, age and the Röstigraben (the language divide) do not explain the rate. And the decline the Confederation has been reporting since 2021 is to a large extent a counting artefact.
Executive Summary
Every year SECO (the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs) counts how many employers use the simplified settlement procedure, the route through which most private households register their domestic help legally: 65,669 did so in 2025. How that figure is spread across the cantons has never appeared in any report. It sits in an Excel table of the Federal Social Insurance Office (BSV), detail table 4.2, line by line per compensation office. Clino has set it against the private households counted by the Federal Statistical Office (BFS).
The result is a divide running right through German-speaking Switzerland. Zurich registers 31.3 employers per 1,000 households, Ticino 27.7, Bern 21.9. Lucerne reaches 10.6, St. Gallen 11.2, Basel-Country 6.6. The Swiss average is 16.2; 9 of the 20 cantons without Chèque-Emploi lie above it, 11 below. Between Zurich and Basel-Country lies a factor of 4.7, under an identical federal law, identical wages for the cleaner and an identical threat of fines.
The obvious explanation fails: where SECO inspects more, no more households register. The correlation between inspection density and registration rate is r = +0.13 in the 20 cantons without Chèque-Emploi and −0.00 across all 26. Basel-City inspects most densely, with 560 inspections per 10,000 establishments, and ranks 9th. Zug inspects least, with 37, and ranks 4th. The share of the very old explains nothing either (r = −0.03). And French-speaking Switzerland does not register less, it registers differently: Vaud has 10,976 employers at Chèques-emploi, but only 1,421 in the AHV statistics.
The ranking: 26 cantons, one law, a factor of 4.7
Counted are employers who were registered with the cantonal compensation office under the simplified settlement procedure in 2025, per 1,000 private households on 31 December 2024. This is not a rate of legality: households that settle under the ordinary procedure are missing (see below), as are the Chèque-Emploi cantons. It is the rate of use of the procedure that the Confederation created in 2008 precisely for these households.
| # | per 1,000 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zurich22,796 employers 2025 · 728,411 households | 31.3 |
| 2 | Ticino4,744 employers 2025 · 171,490 households | 27.7 |
| 3 | Bern10,919 employers 2025 · 497,979 households | 21.9 |
| 4 | Zug1,169 employers 2025 · 57,382 households | 20.4 |
| 5 | Schwyz1,499 employers 2025 · 74,118 households | 20.2 |
| 6 | Appenzell Outer Rhodes486 employers 2025 · 25,018 households | 19.4 |
| 7 | Aargau5,866 employers 2025 · 320,967 households | 18.3 |
| 8 | Appenzell Inner Rhodes123 employers 2025 · 7,012 households | 17.5 |
| 9 | Basel-City1,734 employers 2025 · 101,327 households | 17.1 |
| 10 | Thurgau2,085 employers 2025 · 132,111 households | 15.8 |
| 11 | Solothurn1,996 employers 2025 · 131,314 households | 15.2 |
| 12 | Schaffhausen575 employers 2025 · 40,978 households | 14.0 |
| 13 | Grisons1,359 employers 2025 · 97,566 households | 13.9 |
| 14 | Obwalden213 employers 2025 · 17,380 households | 12.3 |
| 15 | Glarus229 employers 2025 · 19,020 households | 12.0 |
| 16 | Uri201 employers 2025 · 16,818 households | 12.0 |
| 17 | St. Gallen2,681 employers 2025 · 238,850 households | 11.2 |
| 18 | Nidwalden222 employers 2025 · 20,544 households | 10.8 |
| 19 | Lucerne2,039 employers 2025 · 193,215 households | 10.6 |
| 20 | Basel-Country895 employers 2025 · 135,831 households | 6.6 |
| 21 | ValaisChèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | 5.1 |
| 22 | VaudChèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | 3.7 |
| 23 | FribourgChèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | 3.7 |
| 24 | GenevaChèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | 3.3 |
| 25 | NeuchâtelChèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | 0.8 |
| 26 | JuraChèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | 0.3 |
Numerator: employers registered in the simplified procedure with the cantonal compensation office in 2025 (BSV detail table 4.2). Denominator: private households on 31.12.2024 (BFS STATPOP). Switzerland: 16.2. The six chèque-emploi cantons (FR, VD, VS, NE, GE, JU) settle most household jobs through a chèque structure that appears in the AHV statistics as a single employer; their rate is therefore not comparable. Source: BSV, BFS.
The map: a divide right through German-speaking Switzerland
Zurich, Ticino, Bern, Zug, Schwyz and Appenzell Outer Rhodes form the top. Central Switzerland around Lucerne, eastern Switzerland around St. Gallen and north-western Switzerland around Basel-Country bring up the rear of German-speaking Switzerland. French-speaking Switzerland appears pale, for a different reason: there, registration runs through Chèque-Emploi structures, which count as a single employer in the AHV statistics.
Dark = high rate. French-speaking Switzerland appears light because its households settle through chèque-emploi structures, not because they register less. Source: BSV detail table 4.2, BFS STATPOP.
Hypothesis 1: more inspections, more registrations. Refuted.
The Federal Act against Undeclared Work (BGSA) relies on deterrence: the cantons inspect, SECO counts the inspections. If deterrence worked, cantons with a high inspection density would have a higher registration rate. They do not. The 20 cantons without Chèque-Emploi produce a cloud of points with no direction.
Each dot is a canton. x: undeclared-work inspections per 10,000 establishments in 2025 (SECO BGSA report, chart 4.1; AI/AR and UR/NW/OW grouped by SECO). y: employers in the simplified procedure per 1,000 households. r = +0.13 across the 20 cantons without chèque-emploi, −0.00 across all 26. Basel-City inspects most densely and sits mid-table; Zug inspects least and ranks 4th. Source: SECO, BSV, BFS.
Basel-City inspects 15 times more densely than Zug and registers fewer employers per household. The registration rate does not follow the inspection, it follows the habit.
This is no acquittal for the inspections, but a pointer to where they are aimed: in 2025, only 239 of the inspections across Switzerland took place in private households, the rest in businesses. SECO's inspection density measures the pressure on hospitality and construction, not on living rooms. Anyone who wants to raise registration in Lucerne or St. Gallen will find no lever in the inspection statistics.
Hypothesis 2: where more very old people live, more care is registered. Refuted.
Care at home is the fastest-growing segment of domestic work. Cantons with a higher share of over-80s should therefore have more employers in the simplified procedure. The relationship across the 20 cantons without Chèque-Emploi is r = −0.03. Ticino has the highest share of the very old, 8.2 %, and ranks 2nd; Basel-Country has the second-highest, 7.6 %, and ranks 20th. Zug, at 5.6 %, has a below-average share and ranks 4th.
The explanation lies closer to the compensation office than to demographics. Where a compensation office actively offers and promotes the simplified procedure, it gets used. SVA Zürich runs its own section called «Hausdienst» (domestic service), SVA Aargau a page called «Haushalte mit Angestellten» (households with employees). Where the office steers households into the ordinary procedure, they disappear from this statistic, not from legality.
Hypothesis 3: French-speaking Switzerland registers less. Measured wrongly.
Geneva 3.3, Vaud 3.7, Fribourg 3.7, Neuchâtel 0.8, Jura 0.3: going by the AHV statistics, French-speaking Switzerland would be a paradise of undeclared work. It is the opposite. Since 1998 (Valais), 2004 (Geneva), 2005 (Vaud) and 2006 (Fribourg), household employment there has run through Chèque-Emploi structures: the household buys hours of wages, the structure settles AHV, accident insurance and withholding tax. For the compensation office, the structure is a single employer, or it treats the cleaner as its own employee outright.
In 2024 Vaud had 10,976 employers at Chèques-emploi and 1,439 in the simplified procedure: 7.6 times as many. Fribourg 3,130 active Chèque contracts against 668: 4.7 times as many. Geneva cites around 15,000 households a year, undated and unaudited. If Vaud is counted with its Chèque employers, it comes to around 32.5 per 1,000: arithmetically ahead of Zurich. The canton that ranks 23rd in the AHV statistics would, with its own channel, be the leader.
| Canton | Simplified procedure 2025 | Chèque structure | Chèque employers | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geneva | 716 | Chèque service | ≈ 15,000 | self-reported |
| Vaud | 1,421 | Chèques-emploi (EPER) | 10,976 | official |
| Fribourg | 547 | Chèque Emploi Fribourg | 3,130 | official |
| Valais | 869 | Top Relais | ≈ 2,500 | self-reported |
| Neuchâtel | 66 | TickeTAC | – | not published |
| Jura | 10 | Chèque Emploi Jura (Caritas) | – | not published |
Chèque-emploi structures (Geneva: PRO/Chèque service; Vaud: EPER; Fribourg: Chèque Emploi Fribourg; Valais: Top Relais; Neuchâtel: TAC; Jura: Caritas) settle the households as their own employees or as one collective employer. Official user counts exist only for Vaud (EPER, 2024) and Fribourg (management report 2024, active contracts). Geneva and Valais: operators’ self-reports, undated. Neuchâtel and Jura publish nothing. Source: BSV, EPER, fr.ch, chequeservice.ch, toprelais.ch.
Hypothesis 4: households are turning their backs on the procedure. To a large extent a counting artefact.
The SECO report shows a decline in the simplified procedure from 98,305 employers in 2021 to 65,669 in 2025, minus 33 %. The cantonal lines show where it comes from: Vaud fell from 11,372 to 1,804 (2022), Geneva from 5,484 to 1,264, Neuchâtel from 599 to 154, Fribourg a year later from 1,562 to 722. German-speaking Switzerland barely moved.
Two compensation offices explain the break in writing. OCAS Geneva in its 2023 annual report: «Cette baisse est due au transfert du siège d’une plateforme en ligne spécialisée dans l’économie domestique dans un autre canton.» The decline, in other words, is due to an online platform specialising in domestic work moving its registered office to another canton. The Neuchâtel office in its 2022 report: a member that until then had registered every household individually «considère désormais ces travailleurs comme ses propres salariés», now treats these workers as its own employees. The national time series therefore measures where platforms have their registered office and how they settle, not how many households register legally.
The decline from 2024 to 2025 (-3.8 %) is broader: 13 cantons lose more than 10 %, among them Ticino (-22.8 %), Zug (-26.8 %) and St. Gallen (−19.6 %). It coincides with the introduction of VAV plus on 1 January 2025, the new procedure for households that voluntarily settle under the ordinary rules. No compensation office explains it. Zurich grows by +10.5 % in the same year.
| # | Δ 2024–25 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jura20 → 10 · Chèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | −50.0 % |
| 2 | Geneva1,348 → 716 · Chèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | −46.9 % |
| 3 | Zug1,597 → 1,169 | −26.8 % |
| 4 | Ticino6,144 → 4,744 | −22.8 % |
| 5 | Glarus296 → 229 | −22.6 % |
| 6 | Grisons1,699 → 1,359 | −20.0 % |
| 7 | St. Gallen3,336 → 2,681 | −19.6 % |
| 8 | Nidwalden273 → 222 | −18.7 % |
| 9 | Fribourg668 → 547 · Chèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | −18.1 % |
| 10 | Thurgau2,519 → 2,085 | −17.2 % |
| 11 | Obwalden249 → 213 | −14.5 % |
| 12 | Neuchâtel77 → 66 · Chèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | −14.3 % |
| 13 | Lucerne2,331 → 2,039 | −12.5 % |
| 14 | Schwyz1,606 → 1,499 | −6.7 % |
| 15 | Basel-Country951 → 895 | −5.9 % |
| 16 | Schaffhausen603 → 575 | −4.6 % |
| 17 | Vaud1,439 → 1,421 · Chèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | −1.3 % |
| 18 | Solothurn2,018 → 1,996 | −1.1 % |
| 19 | Bern11,025 → 10,919 | −1.0 % |
| 20 | Aargau5,894 → 5,866 | −0.5 % |
| 21 | Appenzell Inner Rhodes123 → 123 | 0.0 % |
| 22 | Appenzell Outer Rhodes485 → 486 | +0.2 % |
| 23 | Basel-City1,707 → 1,734 | +1.6 % |
| 24 | Valais816 → 869 · Chèque-emploi canton: AHV statistics incomplete | +6.5 % |
| 25 | Uri185 → 201 | +8.6 % |
| 26 | Zurich20,628 → 22,796 | +10.5 % |
Switzerland: −3.8 % (68,247 to 65,669). The decline coincides with the launch of VAV plus on 1.1.2025; no compensation office explains it. Geneva and Jura: chèque cantons, small base. Source: BSV detail table 4.2.
The Basel-Country puzzle: 6.6 per 1,000 in the AHV statistics, 42.5 in its own compensation office’s books
Three compensation offices publish how many household employers they keep on their books in total, across all procedures. The figures turn the ranking on its head. SVA Basel-Landschaft counts 5,776 «Hausdienstarbeitgebende» (household-service employers), 42.5 per 1,000 households, but only 15 % of them in the simplified procedure. SVA Zürich counts 39,741 households, 54.6 per 1,000, of which 57 % in the simplified procedure. Ticino 12,106, 70.6 per 1,000, 39 % simplified.
| Canton | Household employers per the office 2025 | per 1,000 households | of which simplified procedure | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ticino | 12,106 | 70.6 | 4,744 | 39 % |
| Zurich | 39,741 | 54.6 | 22,796 | 57 % |
| Basel-Country | 5,776 | 42.5 | 895 | 15 % |
Only three compensation offices publish a separate «household employer» category (all procedures). It shows that many households settle in the ordinary procedure and are missing from the VAV statistics. The categories are not defined identically across offices. Source: SVA Zürich annual report 2025 p. 75; SVA Basel-Landschaft annual report 2025 p. 28; IAS Ticino Rendiconto 2025 tab. 4.1; BSV detail table 4.2.
What the AHV statistics see
- •Basel-Country: 895 employers in the simplified procedure, 6.6 per 1,000, rank 20
- •Zurich: 22,796, 31.3 per 1,000, rank 1
- •Ticino: 4,744, 27.7 per 1,000, rank 2
What the compensation offices count
- •Basel-Country: 5,776 household-service employers, 42.5 per 1,000
- •Zurich: 39,741 households, 54.6 per 1,000
- •Ticino: 12,106 economie domestiche (households), 70.6 per 1,000
Basel-Country is the worst German-speaking canton in the AHV statistics and one of the best according to the books of its own compensation office. Nobody knows Switzerland's registration rate, because the 26 offices do not count the same thing.
Surprising Findings
The table the SECO report does not know
The report on the Federal Act against Undeclared Work publishes the simplified procedure only as a national total. Since 2013 the BSV has published the same figure per compensation office, in detail table 4.2 on the administration of the AHV. The sum of the 26 cantonal offices (65,460) plus the association offices gives exactly the SECO figure. Two offices, Geneva and Neuchâtel, print their line in their annual report; it matches to the unit.
VAV plus: 1,153 in Switzerland, 1,400 in Zurich alone
For 2025 SECO reports 1,153 employers across Switzerland in the new VAV plus procedure. In the same year SVA Zürich writes of “almost 40,000 private households”, of which “1,400 chose the new VAVplus offer”. Either SECO counts at a different reference date or the definitions differ. The national figure cannot be quoted without this caveat.
Zug: fewest inspections, rank 4
37 inspections per 10,000 establishments is the lowest value in Switzerland, one fifteenth of Basel-City. Even so, Zug registers 20.4 employers per 1,000 households, almost twice as many as neighbouring Lucerne. Low taxes explain only half of it: Schwyz is level at 20.2, Nidwalden at 10.8 ranks 18th.
The Chèque-Emploi idea has never crossed the Röstigraben
Six French-speaking cantons have run Chèque structures for up to 28 years, some launched by the state (Geneva, Vaud), some carried by Caritas or municipalities. In German-speaking Switzerland there is not a single one. Instead, Zurich, with 39,741 households at the SVA, keeps the largest register in the country, without a Chèque, using a procedure the Confederation created in 2008 for exactly this purpose.
What this means for households
Going by these figures, whether a household registers its cleaner depends less on fear of an inspection than on how easy its own compensation office makes it and whether the neighbours do it. For households in Lucerne, St. Gallen or Basel-Country the same law applies as in Zurich: AHV contributions from the first franc of wages, accident insurance from the first day of work, and the simplified procedure is open to every household up to a total payroll of CHF 60,480. Registration with your own compensation office takes an afternoon. Clino guides you through the steps; the household itself has to decide and sign.
All 26 cantons in detail
| Canton | VAV 2025 | VAV 2024 | Δ | Households | per 1,000 | Inspections | 80+ | Chèque |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zurich | 22,796 | 20,628 | +10.5 % | 728,411 | 31.3 | 124 | 5.5 % | |
| Ticino | 4,744 | 6,144 | −22.8 % | 171,490 | 27.7 | 552 | 8.2 % | |
| Bern | 10,919 | 11,025 | −1.0 % | 497,979 | 21.9 | 113 | 6.8 % | |
| Zug | 1,169 | 1,597 | −26.8 % | 57,382 | 20.4 | 37 | 5.6 % | |
| Schwyz | 1,499 | 1,606 | −6.7 % | 74,118 | 20.2 | 176 | 5.4 % | |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 486 | 485 | +0.2 % | 25,018 | 19.4 | 226 * | 6.1 % | |
| Aargau | 5,866 | 5,894 | −0.5 % | 320,967 | 18.3 | 149 | 5.4 % | |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 123 | 123 | 0.0 % | 7,012 | 17.5 | 226 * | 6.1 % | |
| Basel-City | 1,734 | 1,707 | +1.6 % | 101,327 | 17.1 | 560 | 6.6 % | |
| Thurgau | 2,085 | 2,519 | −17.2 % | 132,111 | 15.8 | 113 | 5.3 % | |
| Solothurn | 1,996 | 2,018 | −1.1 % | 131,314 | 15.2 | 114 | 6.1 % | |
| Schaffhausen | 575 | 603 | −4.6 % | 40,978 | 14.0 | 297 | 6.8 % | |
| Grisons | 1,359 | 1,699 | −20.0 % | 97,566 | 13.9 | 124 | 6.8 % | |
| Obwalden | 213 | 249 | −14.5 % | 17,380 | 12.3 | 193 * | 6.0 % | |
| Glarus | 229 | 296 | −22.6 % | 19,020 | 12.0 | 85 | 6.1 % | |
| Uri | 201 | 185 | +8.6 % | 16,818 | 12.0 | 193 * | 6.5 % | |
| St. Gallen | 2,681 | 3,336 | −19.6 % | 238,850 | 11.2 | 205 | 5.7 % | |
| Nidwalden | 222 | 273 | −18.7 % | 20,544 | 10.8 | 193 * | 6.5 % | |
| Lucerne | 2,039 | 2,331 | −12.5 % | 193,215 | 10.6 | 74 | 5.6 % | |
| Basel-Country | 895 | 951 | −5.9 % | 135,831 | 6.6 | 320 | 7.6 % | |
| Valais | 869 | 816 | +6.5 % | 169,265 | 5.1 | 196 | 6.0 % | yes |
| Vaud | 1,421 | 1,439 | −1.3 % | 381,144 | 3.7 | 255 | 5.4 % | yes |
| Fribourg | 547 | 668 | −18.1 % | 147,964 | 3.7 | 353 | 4.7 % | yes |
| Geneva | 716 | 1,348 | −46.9 % | 218,030 | 3.3 | 79 | 5.6 % | yes |
| Neuchâtel | 66 | 77 | −14.3 % | 85,107 | 0.8 | 241 | 6.5 % | yes |
| Jura | 10 | 20 | −50.0 % | 34,203 | 0.3 | 294 | 6.7 % | yes |
| CH | 65,669 | 68,247 | −3.8 % | 4,063,044 | 16.2 | 193 | 6.0 % |
VAV = employers in the simplified settlement procedure (BSV detail table 4.2, reporting year). Households 31.12.2024 (BFS). Inspections per 10,000 establishments 2025 (SECO; AI/AR and UR/NW/OW grouped). 80+ = share of over-80s in the resident population 31.12.2025, provisional (BFS). Full columns in the CSV.
Sources
- BSV: Administration of the AHV, detail table 4.2 Simplified settlement procedure 2012 to 2025 (AK-4.2_d.xlsx) (15.7.2026), Employers per compensation office, reporting year; employees and contributions previous year
- BSV: Explanatory notes to the questionnaire for the accounting year 2025 (2026), Definition of field 707 (employers) and 717 (VAV plus)
- BFS STATPOP: Private households by canton and household size on 31 December 2024 (cc-d-01.02.02.02) (17.9.2025), 4,063,044 private households
- SECO: Report on the enforcement of the BGSA 2025, chart 4.1 and table 7.1 (17.6.2026), Inspections per 10,000 establishments; 65,669 employers, 1,153 VAV plus
- BFS STATPOP/BEVNAT: Provisional balance of the permanent resident population 2025 (px-x-0102020000_202) (2026), Population 80+ per canton
- EPER/HEKS: Chèques-emploi Vaud, factsheet 2023 and Réformés 03.2026 (2024), 10,976 employers, 6,014 employees
- Chèque Emploi Fribourg: Rapport de gestion 2024; fr.ch, Chèque emploi (2024/2025), 3,130 active contracts in 2024; 3,235 employers in 2025
- SVA Zürich: Jahresbericht 2025, p. 21 and p. 75 (2026), 39,741 employers in private households; 1,400 VAVplus
- SVA Basel-Landschaft: Jahresbericht 2025, p. 28 (2026), 5,776 household-service employers (Hausdienstarbeitgebende)
- IAS Ticino: Rendiconto 2025, tab. 4.1 (2026), 12,106 economie domestiche; 4,744 in the simplified procedure
- OCAS Genève: Rapport annuel 2023, p. 15; Rapport annuel 2025, p. 15 (2024/2026), Explanation of the 2022 break; 716 employers in the simplified procedure in 2025
- CCNC Neuchâtel: Rapport de gestion 2022, p. 11; Rapport financier 2025, p. 17 (2023/2026), Explanation of the 2022 break; 66 employers in 2025
Do you represent an organization supporting households or workers?
Become a partner→Further Resources
About Clino
Clino is a Swiss SaaS platform enabling households to legally employ domestic workers: payroll, contract and AHV registration; Clino guides the household, insurance stays with the household. CHF 19.90/month. All 26 cantons. Founded 2026 in Zurich. clino.ch


























