Skip to content
This study in the mediaBlick
Study25 March 2026

The Enforcement Lottery: One Inspection Every 1,645 Years for Swiss Households

304 workplace inspections in the household sector. 500,000 employer households. 83 inspectors for all of Switzerland. A Clino data analysis based on the SECO BGSA Report 2023 reveals that enforcement in Switzerland’s largest undeclared-work segment has effectively ceased.

304
Workplace inspections in the household sector (2023)
500,000
Estimated employer households
1,645 yrs
Years between inspections
CHF 0.15
Expected annual cost of non-compliance
83 FTE
Inspectors nationwide

Zurich, 25 March 2026 — Anyone employing a domestic worker in Switzerland without registering them with the AHV faces a 0.06% probability of being inspected in any given year. Statistically, that amounts to one inspection every 1,645 years. A Clino data analysis of the SECO BGSA Report 2023 exposes the dramatic collapse of enforcement in the household sector — and why the economic logic clearly argues against legal registration.


1. The National Equation: 304 out of 500,000

In 2023, cantonal enforcement bodies conducted a total of 13,644 workplace inspections — of which only 304targeted “private household services.” That is 2.2% of all inspections — for a sector estimated to account for 30–60% of all undeclared employment relationships in Switzerland.

304
Household inspections 2023
500,000
Estimated employer households
0.06%
Annual inspection probability
32x
Less than the cross-sector average

For comparison: across all sectors, the inspection rate stands at 1.94% (13,644 inspections across 703,957 registered workplaces) — one inspection every 52 years. The household sector is thus inspected at 32 times lower intensity than the national average.


2. Canton Ranking: Who Inspects — and Who Doesn’t

Inspection density varies massively between cantons. Basel-Stadt leads with 758 inspections per 10,000 workplaces, while Zug stands at just 42 — an 18-fold difference.

Highest Inspection Density (WI/10,000 workplaces)

  1. 1. Basel-Stadt (BS)758
  2. 2. Ticino (TI)584
  3. 3. Jura (JU)488
  4. 4. Schaffhausen (SH)357
  5. 5. Basel-Landschaft (BL)320

Lowest Inspection Density (WI/10,000 workplaces)

  1. 1. Zug (ZG)42
  2. 2. Bern (BE)75
  3. 3. Lucerne (LU)76
  4. 4. Appenzell I.Rh./A.Rh. (AI/AR)77
  5. 5. Geneva (GE)103

At the household level, the disparities are even more dramatic. In Bern, an employer would statistically wait 4,392 years for an inspection. In Zug, 6,900 years. Even in the most heavily inspected cantons — Basel-Stadt and Ticino — the wait time stands at 417 and 548 years respectively.


3. The Economic Incentive: CHF 0.15 vs. CHF 1,265

The central question: does legal registration make financial sense? The data deliver an unequivocal answer.

Expected Cost of Non-Compliance

  • Inspection probability: 0.06% per year
  • Average fine upon inspection: CHF 246
  • Expected annual cost: CHF 0.15
  • Even in the toughest canton (VS): CHF 0.19
  • Even at the maximum fine of CHF 5,000: CHF 0.65/year

Cost of Legal Employment

  • AHV/IV/EO (employer share 5.3%): CHF 353
  • ALV (1.1%): CHF 73
  • FAK (~1.5%): CHF 100
  • UVG-BU (0.505%): CHF 34
  • Admin costs + withholding tax: CHF 466
  • Clino subscription: CHF 239
  • Total: CHF 1,265/year
7,360:1
Compliance-to-expected-fine ratio
CHF 0.15
Expected annual fine cost
CHF 1,265
Annual cost of legal employment
8,400x
Enforcement increase needed

To close the deterrence gap through inspections alone, enforcement intensity in the household sector would need to increase by a factor of 8,400. Alternatively, the inspection probability would have to rise from 0.06% to at least 54% — even when applying the maximum fine of CHF 5,000.


At an inspection probability of 0.06% and an average fine of CHF 246, the expected annual cost of undeclared household work is CHF 0.15 — less than a postage stamp. Legal registration costs CHF 1,265. The ratio: 8,400 to 1.


4. Collapse of Household Inspections: −56% Since 2021

Enforcement activity in the household sector is not merely low — it is actively shrinking, while other sectors are growing.

Sector20212023Change
Hospitality (Food & Beverage)1,4122,268+60.6%
Hair Salons / Cosmetics470919+95.5%
Secondary Construction3,1023,615+16.5%
Total all sectors12,06213,644+13.1%
Private Households693304−56.1%

Coordination referrals for the household sector also fell by 50%: from 248 (2019) to 124 (2023). The authorities are not only inspecting less — they are also referring fewer household cases to specialist agencies.

The Enforcement Paradox: The household sector accounts for an estimated 200,000–400,000 unregistered employment relationships, making it the single largest segment of undeclared work in Switzerland. Yet it receives only 2.2% of all workplace inspections. The workforce: 97% female, predominantly with a migration background. The annual AHV gap: CHF 55–85 million.


5. The Romandie Divide: 5.3x Higher Fines

The data reveal a striking cultural divide in enforcement. Romandie cantons collect 5.3 times more revenue per inspection than their German-speaking counterparts.

CHF 175.94
Romandie average (per WI)
CHF 33.26
German-speaking average (per WI)
5.3x
Fine differential
CHF 0.00
Fines in AI/AR (zero francs)

Highest Fines per Inspection

  1. 1. Valais (VS)CHF 323.51
  2. 2. Geneva (GE)CHF 319.89
  3. 3. Vaud (VD)CHF 196.19
  4. 4. Zug (ZG)CHF 125.00
  5. 5. St. Gallen (SG)CHF 121.68

Lowest Fines per Inspection

  1. 1. AI/ARCHF 0.00
  2. 2. Thurgau (TG)CHF 8.57
  3. 3. Zurich (ZH)CHF 12.33
  4. 4. Aargau (AG)CHF 14.70
  5. 5. Ticino (TI)CHF 16.81

Particularly striking: Zurich, the largest canton, conducted 1,571 workplace inspections but collected only CHF 19,375 — that is CHF 12.33 per inspection. In Valais, a single inspection yields CHF 323.51 — 26 times more.


6. The Rational-Actor Calculation

At what inspection probability does legal registration become the economically rational choice? The answer: at no realistic level.

// At the average fine (CHF 246):

P(inspection) ≥ CHF 865 / (0.32 × CHF 246)

P(inspection) ≥ 1,099% → 11 inspections per year

// At the maximum fine (CHF 5,000):

P(inspection) ≥ CHF 865 / (0.32 × CHF 5,000)

P(inspection) ≥ 54.1% → every 2 years

// Current status:

P(inspection) = 0.06% → every 1,645 years

At average fines, you would need 11 inspections per year per household — mathematically impossible with 83 inspectors for 500,000 households. Even with the BGSA maximum fine of CHF 5,000, an inspection rate of 54% would be required — a 900-fold increaseover today’s level.

In 2023, only 65 Art. 13 BGSA sanctions were imposed nationwide — against 500,000 households. The probability of a formal sanction: 0.013%. Expected cost: CHF 0.65 per year. Still 1,700 times less than the cost of compliance.


Sources

  • SECO BGSA Report (2023) — 83 FTE inspectors, 13,644 workplace inspections, cantonal breakdown, fines, sector analysis
  • FSO SLFS (2023) — 104,000 registered cleaning workers (all sectors)
  • Homegate/Quitt HHR (2025) — 500,000 households with domestic help; average wages
  • Prof. Schneider/IAW (2023–2024) — Shadow economy 6.7% of GDP (2023), 7.1% forecast (2024)
  • FSO STATENT (2021) — 703,957 registered workplaces as the basis for cantonal per-capita calculations

Do you represent an organization supporting households or workers?

Become a partner

About Clino

Clino is a Swiss SaaS platform enabling households to legally employ domestic workers — payroll, contracts, social security, and accident insurance included. CHF 19.90/month. All 26 cantons. Founded 2025 in Zurich. clino.ch

Ready? First payslip in 5 minutes.

Start for free