In 1910 there was one domestic servant for every 9 households, in 2025 one domestic worker for every 57
In 1910, 89,605 domestic servants lived in their employers’ homes in Switzerland, 98% of them women. That was 108 for every 1,000 households. Clino analysed the federal censuses from 1888 and the Federal Statistical Office’s employment statistics up to 2025, for Switzerland and for every canton. Today 71,932 people work mainly for private households, 17.5 per 1,000 households. The two are not counted the same way: in 1910 only servants living with the family were counted, today everyone whose main job is with a private household, often for a few hours a week. The map has turned around: Ticino, one of the cantons with the fewest servants in 1910, now has the second-highest registration rate in the simplified procedure.
Summary
Around 1900, service in another family’s home was one of the most common paid jobs outside farming for women from modest backgrounds. The federal censuses counted 79,488 live-in servants in 1888, and the most in 1930, 111,213. Per household, the share was higher in 1888 than in any later census: 125 per 1,000 households, one for every 8.
In the second half of the 20th century the maid almost disappeared. In 1990 the census still counted 15,394 people in the occupational class of household work, 5.4 per 1,000 households. The FSO employment statistics, which count differently, show 71,932 people working mainly for private households in 2025: 17.5 per 1,000 households, one for every 57. In the simplified procedure of old-age insurance (AHV), 65,669 households were registered as employers in 2025, one in 62.
So the maids are not back. What is back is the number: compared with the average of 2011 to 2013, the number of people employed by private households rose by 35% by 2025, and in 2024 it reached 78,959, the highest value since the statistics began in 1991.
From one in 9 to one in 57 households
The curve has three sections because the way of counting changes twice. Until 1960 only servants living with the employer, with board and lodging, are counted. From 1970 to 1990 the census counts the occupational class of household work, part-time included. From 1991 the FSO estimates people employed by private households from surveys, by their main job. The jump between 1990 and the years after is mostly a result of this change, not a return of the servants.
- 11888 to 1960: census, servants living with the employer
- 21970 to 1990: census, occupational class household work, part-time included
- 32000 to 2025: FSO employment statistics, persons whose main job is with a private household
- Open circle: 1960 including domestic workers living elsewhere (52)
Source: Federal censuses 1888 to 1990, FSO (ETS, STATPOP), compensation offices; calculation Clino · Chart: Clino
All values of the time series
| Year | Persons | Private households | per 1,000 households | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1888 | 79,488 | 638,064 | 124.6 | 1 |
| 1900 | 84,895 | 728,920 | 116.5 | 1 |
| 1910 | 89,605 | 829,009 | 108.1 | 1 |
| 1920 | 92,878 | 883,346 | 105.1 | 1 |
| 1930 | 111,213 | 994,587 | 111.8 | 1 |
| 1941 | 91,060 | 1,209,605 | 75.3 | 1 |
| 1950 | 89,455 | 1,385,529 | 64.6 | 1 |
| 1960 | 70,653 | 1,581,000 | 44.7 | 1 |
| 1960 | 82,572 | 1,581,000 | 52.2 | 1, incl. living elsewhere |
| 1970 | 46,283 | 2,051,592 | 22.6 | 2 |
| 1980 | 26,224 | 2,449,784 | 10.7 | 2 |
| 1990 | 15,394 | 2,841,850 | 5.4 | 2 |
| 2000 | 59,829 | 3,115,399 | 19.2 | 3 |
| 2012 | 53,277 | 3,488,738 | 15.3 | 3 |
| 2020 | 54,591 | 3,867,390 | 14.1 | 3 |
| 2024 | 78,959 | 4,063,044 | 19.4 | 3 |
| 2025 | 71,932 | 4,105,458 | 17.5 | 3 |
One comparison that holds across the breaks: in absolute numbers, about as many people work for private households today as in 1888 (79,488) or 1960 (82,572 domestic workers, 70,653 of them living in). But the number of households has grown 6.4-fold since 1888. And people who work for households today often do so for a few hours a week, for several families.
Women remain the majority, but no longer almost the only ones: in 1910, 98.3% of servants were women; in 2025 the share among people employed by private households is 75%. Today’s statistics also count gardeners, drivers and carers.
The map has turned around
In 1910 the cities led. Basel-City had 185 servants per 1,000 households, Geneva 180, almost one for every five households. Lucerne (155), Zug, Vaud and Neuchâtel followed; Zurich, with 121, ranked 7. At the bottom were Appenzell Inner Rhodes, Basel-Country, Valais and Ticino.
Today the order is different. In the simplified procedure Zurich registers the most employers, 31.3 per 1,000 households, followed by Ticino with 27.7. Counting all procedures of Ticino’s cantonal compensation office, there are 70.6 employers per 1,000 households, slightly more than the servants of 1910 (67.3). The comparison has a catch: then the census counted people living in the household, today the office counts households that register someone, often for a few hours a week. Basel-City has fallen to rank 9. There is no discernible link between the 1910 ranking and today’s.
That Geneva, Vaud, Fribourg and Neuchâtel rank low in the simplified procedure does not mean nobody there employs household help. In French-speaking Switzerland most employment runs through chèque-emploi schemes. Including them, Vaud reaches 32.5 employers per 1,000 households and Geneva, according to its scheme, about 72.
Bern incl. Jura. 1910 counts persons, 2025 households that register someone. The ranking is what is compared.
Source: Federal censuses 1888 to 1990, FSO (ETS, STATPOP), compensation offices; calculation Clino · Chart: Clino
| Canton | 1910 | Foreign 1910 | 1960 | Foreign 1960 | 2025 simpl. | 2025 all |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basel-City | 185.5 | 66% | 44.6 | 57% | 17.1 | |
| Geneva | 179.5 | 50% | 69.0 | 63% | 3.3 | 72.1 |
| Lucerne | 155.4 | 10% | 75.0 | 15% | 10.6 | |
| Zug | 140.2 | 12% | 74.7 | 22% | 20.4 | |
| Vaud | 137.8 | 16% | 58.0 | 28% | 3.7 | 32.5 |
| Neuchâtel | 131.8 | 15% | 45.6 | 27% | 0.8 | |
| Zurich | 120.9 | 42% | 49.8 | 51% | 31.3 | 54.6 |
| Obwalden | 111.7 | 5% | 76.0 | 10% | 12.3 | |
| Nidwalden | 106.4 | 6% | 82.6 | 10% | 10.8 | |
| Fribourg | 104.8 | 8% | 49.8 | 10% | 3.7 | 24.9 |
| Grisons | 99.8 | 36% | 53.1 | 33% | 13.9 | |
| Schaffhausen | 96.7 | 44% | 37.5 | 38% | 14.0 | |
| Bern | 95.6 | 7% | 51.8 | 25% | 20.5 | |
| Uri | 95.4 | 6% | 63.7 | 11% | 12.0 | |
| St. Gallen | 91.9 | 42% | 52.7 | 26% | 11.2 | |
| Schwyz | 83.1 | 11% | 68.5 | 14% | 20.2 | |
| Thurgau | 82.4 | 36% | 54.2 | 30% | 15.8 | |
| Aargau | 72.6 | 18% | 45.2 | 30% | 18.3 | |
| Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 70.3 | 21% | 49.8 | 19% | 19.4 | |
| Solothurn | 68.8 | 11% | 39.6 | 36% | 15.2 | |
| Glarus | 67.9 | 27% | 46.7 | 31% | 12.0 | |
| Ticino | 67.3 | 45% | 48.4 | 67% | 27.7 | 70.6 |
| Valais | 62.0 | 10% | 38.0 | 25% | 5.1 | 19.9 |
| Basel-Country | 60.0 | 28% | 47.8 | 54% | 6.6 | 42.5 |
| Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 59.7 | 16% | 55.0 | 12% | 17.5 |
Foreign share = share of foreign nationals among domestic workers. Bern incl. Jura. 2025 all procedures: compensation-office total (ZH, BL, TI) or simplified procedure plus chèque-emploi (FR, VD official; VS, GE as stated by the scheme).
Foreign women already in 1910
In 1910, 25,294 of the 89,605 servants were foreign nationals, 28.2%. In Basel-City the share was 66%, in Geneva 50%, in Ticino 45% and in Zurich 42%. In the rural Catholic cantons with many maids, Lucerne, Zug, Obwalden and Nidwalden, nearly all of them were Swiss.
The historian Andrea Althaus estimates that between 1920 and 1965, war years excepted, about 30,000 German and Austrian women a year came to Switzerland as maids, including those working in hotels and restaurants; in 1930 more than 80% of foreign domestic workers came from these two countries. In 1960, 36.2% of domestic workers were foreign nationals.
There is no official figure on nationality today. On the platform quitt, of 10,641 contracts in 2024, 26% were held by Swiss nationals, 21% by Portuguese, 8% by Spanish, 6% by Italian and 5% by Brazilian nationals. That is one platform, not the whole country.
What this means for households today
The maid of 1910 had board and lodging but no old-age insurance, which has existed only since 1948. Anyone who employs a cleaner or nanny today is their employer, even for a few hours: AHV contributions from the first franc, accident insurance from the first hour, a cantonal standard employment contract. The guide Registering a cleaner explains the steps.
Quellen
- Federal census 1910, volume 1 (table I) and volume 3, occupational statistics (tables V, Vb) (1910)
- Federal census 1960, volume 28, employment and occupation (table 11) (1960)
- Historical Statistics of Switzerland HSSO, tables F.7a, F.00, B.1a, B.6b (2012)
- FSO, employment statistics (ETS), section T; private households 1850 to 2025; STATPOP (2026)
- Compensation offices, simplified procedure and annual reports (SVA Zurich, SVA Basel-Country, IAS Ticino); chèque-emploi schemes (2025)
- Andrea Althaus, Deutsche Hausangestellte in der Schweiz, Alemannisches Jahrbuch 65/66 (2018)
- quitt, household help report 2025 (nationalities 2024) (2025)
Do you represent an organization supporting households or workers?
Become a partner →Further Resources
Press Contact
Media inquiries, interviews, background information
About Clino
Clino is a Swiss SaaS platform enabling households to legally employ domestic workers: payroll, contract and AHV registration; Clino guides the household, insurance stays with the household. CHF 19.90/month. All 26 cantons. Founded 2026 in Zurich. clino.ch
