How Your Postcode Decides Whether Your Child Gets a Daycare Place
In Solothurn, barely one household in five uses a daycare centre; in Geneva, it's more than two in three: the same federal constitution, but a 3.1x difference depending on where you live.
Swiss childcare isn't one system, it's a lottery with 26 tickets. Three independent official registers point to the same geography: who uses a daycare place, how many places physically exist, and what happens when a single neighbourhood loses its last provider. In eight cantons, even the federal government doesn't know how many families use daycare at all.
Executive Summary
Whether a child in Switzerland goes to daycare depends more on the home canton than on almost anything else. In 2023, according to the BFS, 70.9% of households in Geneva with children aged 0-12 used a daycare centre or after-school care, against 22.5% in the canton of Solothurn and a Swiss average of 44.4%. That is a factor of 3.1, measured within the exact same survey, with the exact same definition. And for eight cantons, from Uri to Appenzell Innerrhoden, the federal government publishes no value at all: the sample is too small, what is missing is a number, not a zero.
The second layer is physical capacity. A canton register from the Conference of Cantonal Social Directors (SODK), compared against the resident population aged 0-4, shows: Basel-City has 489 daycare places per 1,000 children in that age group, Appenzell Innerrhoden only 63. A factor of 7.7, this time on the supply side, independent of the usage statistic and computed from a completely different source. Both layers point the same way: wealthy city cantons ahead, rural small cantons behind.
And then there is a third, hyperlocal layer. In Zurich's Rathaus quarter, the daycare coverage ratio stood at 22.9% in 2014. Since 2018, every single year through 2025, it has been exactly 0.0%, while 60 to 100 preschool-age children still live in the quarter. This isn't a region, it's a single Zurich neighbourhood where childcare infrastructure disappeared entirely. This study is non-partisan, scientifically grounded, and transparent in its methodology and sources.
Layer 1: Whether you use daycare is a question of canton
The Federal Statistical Office's survey on family-complementary childcare (EFG) asks households directly which care form they use. In 2023, Geneva led the ranking with 70.9%, followed by Basel-City (61.3%), Vaud (56.6%) and Zurich (56.3%). At the bottom sit Thurgau (25.0%) and Solothurn with 22.5%, the lowest published figure in the country.
| # | Share of households | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geneva | 70.9 % |
| 2 | Basel-City | 61.3 % |
| 3 | Vaud | 56.6 % |
| 4 | Zurich | 56.3 % |
| 5 | Valais | 49.9 % |
| 6 | Neuchâtel | 47.4 % |
| 7 | Zug | 47.2 % |
| 8 | Jura | 41.7 % |
| 9 | Bern | 41.0 % |
| 10 | Basel-Country | 38.5 % |
| 11 | Ticino | 37.6 % |
| 12 | Fribourg | 37.1 % |
| 13 | Grisons | 34.0 % |
| 14 | St. Gallen | 33.8 % |
| 15 | Lucerne | 32.8 % |
| 16 | Aargau | 31.8 % |
| 17 | Thurgau | 25.0 % |
| 18 | Solothurn | 22.5 % |
Share of households with children aged 0-12 using a daycare centre or after-school care, 2023 (BFS EFG survey). Only 18 of 26 cantons are individually published; the BFS sample is too small for 8 cantons (see box below). Swiss average: 44.4%.
Share of households with children aged 0-12 using a daycare centre or after-school care, 2023 (BFS EFG survey). Darker = higher usage. Geneva leads at 70.9%, Solothurn sits at the lowest published end at 22.5%; Swiss average 44.4%. Grey cantons: no BFS publication, sample too small.
No data, not 0%: these 8 cantons have no published 2023 EFG usage figure
The BFS sample is too small for these cantons; a value of 0% would be wrong, the figure is simply missing.
Layer 2: How many places physically exist at all
The usage rate says who takes up a daycare place, not how many places exist in the first place. To answer that, Clino combines the SODK register of preschool daycare places by canton with BFS population statistics for children aged 0-4: our own computation, clearly labeled as such. The result: Basel-City has 489 places per 1,000 children in that age group, followed by Zug (402) and Geneva (333). At the other end sit Solothurn (89) and Appenzell Innerrhoden with 63, the lowest figure in the entire country.
| # | Places / 1,000 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basel-City | 489 |
| 2 | Zug | 402 |
| 3 | Geneva | 332 |
| 4 | Zurich | 312 |
| 5 | Schaffhausen | 296 |
| 6 | Vaud | 273 |
| 7 | Neuchâtel | 270 |
| 8 | Valais | 248 |
| 9 | Bern | 228 |
| 10 | Basel-Country | 177 |
| 11 | Ticino | 176 |
| 12 | Schwyz | 169 |
| 13 | Jura | 160 |
| 14 | Nidwalden | 156 |
| 15 | Obwalden | 147 |
| 16 | Grisons | 146 |
| 17 | Fribourg | 144 |
| 18 | Uri | 130 |
| 19 | Thurgau | 125 |
| 20 | Aargau | 120 |
| 21 | Appenzell Outer Rhodes | 117 |
| 22 | Glarus | 96 |
| 23 | Lucerne | 94 |
| 24 | St. Gallen | 94 |
| 25 | Solothurn | 89 |
| 26 | Appenzell Inner Rhodes | 63 |
Clino computation: the SODK/Luessi-2024 register of preschool daycare places by canton (latest available year per canton, 2022-2024) divided by the permanent resident population aged 0-4, end-2024 (BFS STATPOP), times 1,000. For some cantons the place count is itself an estimate in the source.
Notably, the two rankings correlate but are not identical. Zug appears in second place on capacity, yet is entirely absent from the usage statistic because the BFS sample was too small for a reliable cantonal figure. That is the core of the problem: for an entire canton with high daycare density, there is no official usage number, while elsewhere both layers tell exactly the same story.
Layer 3: The hyperlocal shock, a Zurich quarter without a single place
Cantonal, or even municipal, figures can hide a very local reality. The City of Zurich publishes its daycare coverage ratio by city quarter, and in the quarter of Rathaus (district 1) an extreme case appears: in 2014 the ratio still stood at 22.9%. In 2017 it briefly jumped above 100% because a single large facility dominated the capacity of this tiny quarter. After that facility closed in 2018, the ratio dropped to 0.0% and stayed there, year after year, through 2025.
Subsidised daycare places relative to preschool-age children, Rathaus quarter (district 1), 2014-2025 (City of Zurich open data). In 2017 the ratio briefly spiked above 100% because a single facility's capacity dominated the tiny quarter; since its closure in 2018 the ratio has been exactly 0.0% every single year, even though 60 to 100 preschool-age children still live in the quarter.
This is not a demographic shift: 60 to 100 preschool-age children still live in the quarter every year, the demand is there. What is missing is the supply, ever since a single facility closed. Rathaus is an extreme example, but it reveals a pattern that cantonal averages fundamentally cannot show: within a canton, even within a city, coverage can flip completely from one side of the street to the other.
Switzerland's language divide in childcare, and what families do instead
Language region shapes the childcare landscape too. In French-speaking Switzerland, 2023 usage stood at 55.0% of households using a daycare centre or after-school care, in German-speaking Switzerland 40.9% (+34% difference), in Ticino 37.0% (French-speaking Switzerland +49%). The usual Röstigraben, Switzerland's language divide, doesn't run where you'd find it in ageing data, it runs in reverse: for daycare usage, French-speaking Switzerland is clearly ahead.
Share of households with children aged 0-12 using a daycare centre or after-school care, by language region, 2023 (BFS EFG survey). French-speaking Switzerland is +34% above German-speaking Switzerland, +49% above Ticino.
Where daycare places are missing, other forms of care step in. In rural areas, grandparents cover 46.8% of childcare, more than any other single form and well above the figure in major cities (26.1%). The daycare lottery does have an informal safety valve, but it has limits: not every family has grandparents nearby, and not every grandmother can step in five days a week.
Numbers to Cite
1. "70.9% of households with children in Geneva use a daycare centre or after-school care, against 22.5% in Solothurn, a factor of 3.1." (BFS, Survey on Family-Complementary Childcare, EFG 2023)
2. "Basel-City counts 489 daycare places per 1,000 children aged 0-4, Appenzell Innerrhoden only 63, a factor of 7.7." (SODK/Luessi 2024 register and BFS STATPOP, computation by Clino)
3. "In Zurich's Rathaus quarter, daycare coverage fell from 22.9% (2014) to exactly 0.0% every single year from 2018 to 2025, even though 60 to 100 preschool-age children still live there." (City of Zurich, open data)
4. "In French-speaking Switzerland, 55.0% of households use daycare, in German-speaking Switzerland 40.9%, in Ticino 37.0%." (BFS EFG 2023)
5. "For 8 of Switzerland's 26 cantons, no published cantonal childcare-usage figure exists for 2023; the BFS sample isn't large enough: no data, not 0%." (BFS EFG 2023)
When your postcode works against you, and what families do anyway
The difficult reality in some cantons
- •Solothurn: only 22.5% daycare usage, no other canton with a published figure is lower
- •Appenzell Innerrhoden: 63 daycare places per 1,000 kids aged 0-4, the lowest figure in Switzerland
- •Zurich's Rathaus quarter: literally 0.0% coverage, every year since 2018
- •8 cantons: no official usage statistic at all, the sample isn't large enough
What families on the ground do anyway
- •Grandparents step in: in rural areas they cover 46.8% of childcare
- •Day-family care (Tagesfamilien) fills gaps, often strongest where daycare centres are missing
- •Hiring a private nanny, independent of the local daycare supply and its waitlist
- •Legally employed with a written contract, AHV registration and accident insurance, wherever you live
No daycare place found? The plan B many families use
When the waitlist outlasts early childhood, hiring your own carer at home, often shared with a neighbouring family to split the cost, is the pragmatic route for many families. Clino registers nannies and carers in private households across all 26 cantons: written contract, AHV registration from the first franc, accident insurance, monthly payslip, for CHF 19.90 a month. Regardless of which postcode happens to have no place available.
Switzerland doesn't have a daycare crisis, it has 26 of them. If you live in Geneva or Basel-City, you find a network. If you live in Solothurn or Appenzell Innerrhoden, or happen to live in Zurich's Rathaus quarter, you mostly find a waitlist, and sometimes not even an official number for it.
Surprising Findings
The eight invisible cantons could hide the biggest gap, precisely because no one measures it
Uri, Schwyz, Obwalden, Nidwalden, Glarus, Schaffhausen, both Appenzells: none of these eight cantons has a published EFG usage figure for 2023. That is not a neutral fact. It means that the very cantons that rank very low on the SODK capacity statistic (Appenzell Innerrhoden: 63 places per 1,000 children, the Swiss low) remain completely in the dark on the usage side.
Zug has plenty of capacity but no official usage figure
Zug ranks second in Switzerland on daycare places per 1,000 children (402), yet doesn't appear at all in the EFG usage ranking because the sample was too small. A canton can therefore be simultaneously among the most generous on supply and among the least studied on demand: two official registers, two entirely different kinds of visibility.
A single daycare closure can take an entire city quarter to zero
In Zurich's Rathaus quarter, the closure of a single large facility in 2018 was enough to drop the coverage ratio from a brief spike above 100% to a sustained 0.0%. Cantonal, and even city-wide, averages smooth over exactly this kind of extreme case. Anyone reading only Zurich's overall statistics would never see it.
Sources
- BFS: Survey on Family-Complementary Childcare (EFG) (2023) — Household usage by canton and language region, daycare/after-school care form, grandparent care by region type
- SODK: Report on Family- and School-Complementary Childcare (Luessi 2024) (2024) — Cantonal register of preschool daycare places, 2022-2024 depending on canton
- BFS: STATPOP, permanent resident population by age and canton (2024) — Children aged 0-4 by canton, end of 2024, denominator for the places-per-1,000 computation
- City of Zurich: open data, daycare coverage ratio by city quarter (2025) — Rathaus quarter (no. 11), years 2014-2025
- Clino: own computation (2026) — Daycare places per 1,000 children aged 0-4, from the SODK register and BFS STATPOP
Do you represent an organization supporting households or workers?
Become a partner→Further Resources
About Clino
Clino is a Swiss SaaS platform enabling households to legally employ domestic workers — payroll, contracts, social security, and accident insurance included. CHF 19.90/month. All 26 cantons. Founded 2025 in Zurich. clino.ch
